Michael Pryce, a licensed paralegal, sought professional negligence coverage under a LawPro policy issued to Jamie Bruce, a lawyer at his firm.
LawPro accepted coverage for the lawyer and the firm but declined coverage for Pryce, who was separately insured under a mandatory Paralegal Professional Liability policy issued by Lloyd’s Underwriters.
The court examined the LawPro policy wording, its commercial background, and the theory of vicarious liability.
It found that the LawPro policy explicitly insures lawyers and their firms only in relation to the professional services of lawyers, not paralegals.
The regulatory scheme mandates separate insurance for lawyers and paralegals, supporting the interpretation that LawPro's policy does not cover paralegals.
The court also rejected the argument that an employer's vicarious liability extends to an insurer's duty to defend an employee not covered by the policy.
The application for coverage was dismissed.