The appellant appealed a Small Claims Court decision awarding the respondent $23,251.25 for unpaid doors.
The appellant argued the respondent fraudulently misrepresented that it would be in Ontario 'for the long run', inducing the contract.
The trial judge found no misrepresentation, preferring the respondent's evidence.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the trial judge made no palpable and overriding error in his factual findings.
The court also declined to hear new issues raised by the appellant on appeal, as leave was not sought under Rule 61.08(2).
