This motion concerned parenting time and decision-making authority for two children.
The applicant mother sought an interim order for sole decision-making and supervised parenting time for the respondent father, citing his substance abuse.
The respondent father denied the allegations and sought a return to previous unsupervised arrangements, later proposing a transitional supervised schedule.
The court, relying on independent evidence from the Voice of the Child Report and Children's Aid Society, found the father's alcohol use to be a significant concern impacting his parenting ability.
The court granted the mother sole decision-making authority and ordered supervised daytime parenting time for the father, along with alcohol prohibition and drug/alcohol screening.
The parties were encouraged to cooperatively expand parenting time as the father demonstrates abstinence, with a right for the father to seek court review after four months if no agreement is reached.