The plaintiff sought leave to amend her statement of claim to include particulars of an oppression remedy related to her shareholding, following a partial settlement of prior employment-related claims.
The defendants opposed the inclusion of paragraphs that referred to the previously settled employment issues, arguing they were contractually barred.
The court granted leave to amend the statement of claim for the oppression remedy but ordered the excision of paragraphs relating to the settled employment claims, finding them to be surplusage and contractually barred.
Costs were awarded against the plaintiff.
