The applicant sought judicial review of a decision by the Immigration Appeal Division confirming his inadmissibility for failing to meet the residency obligation under s. 28 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
The applicant had spent no days in Canada during the relevant five-year period.
The Court found the IAD's assessment of humanitarian and compassionate factors, including the applicant's reasons for remaining abroad and his establishment in Canada, to be reasonable despite a minor factual error.
The application for judicial review was dismissed.
