The accused, Aurèle Guindon, faced eleven counts of sexual exploitation, sexual interference, and sexual assault involving three adolescent boys he employed for property maintenance.
The court found the accused guilty on seven counts of sexual exploitation involving two complainants (D.M. and Z.M.), while acquitting him on four counts related to a third complainant (B.M.) due to concerns about witness testimony tainting.
The central issue was credibility, with the court finding the testimony of D.M. and Z.M. credible and reliable, and rejecting the accused's denials.
The court applied the factors for determining a position of trust or authority under section 153 of the Criminal Code, concluding that such a relationship existed and that the accused's actions were for a sexual purpose.