2 total
The court dismissed a father's motion for reunification therapy, instead incorporating a section 30 parenting assessment's recommendations into a temporary order.
The respondent brought a motion seeking reunification therapy for the children with a family therapist, a right of first refusal for pick-up and drop-off of children at activities, an order to use Our Family Wizard for communication, and an updated parenting assessment within six months.
The applicant opposed the motion and sought implementation of the recommendations from a prior section 30 parenting assessment.
The court dismissed the motion for reunification therapy, finding it contrary to the children's best interests given their opposition and the respondent's failure to meet clinical goals.
The court implemented the prior assessment recommendations as a temporary order and ordered family therapy for the children alone before any parental involvement.
The court ordered the sale of the matrimonial home and granted the applicant exclusive possession pending the sale.
The court considered an urgent motion by Valerie Marinovic for the sale of the matrimonial home and exclusive possession pending sale.
The court ordered the home to be listed for sale, Valerie to have exclusive possession until sale, and costs to Valerie.
Daniel Marinovic’s requests to delay the sale, return to the home, and require a settlement proposal were denied.
The court found Daniel’s opposition to the sale unreasonable and that exclusive possession for Valerie was in the children’s best interests.
