The respondent brought a motion seeking reunification therapy for the children with a family therapist, a right of first refusal for pick-up and drop-off of children at activities, an order to use Our Family Wizard for communication, and an updated parenting assessment within six months.
The applicant opposed the motion and sought implementation of the recommendations from a prior section 30 parenting assessment.
The court dismissed the motion for reunification therapy, finding it contrary to the children's best interests given their opposition and the respondent's failure to meet clinical goals.
The court implemented the prior assessment recommendations as a temporary order and ordered family therapy for the children alone before any parental involvement.