The applicant, a PhD student, was withdrawn from her program after receiving two unsatisfactory progress reports.
She appealed the withdrawal to the Faculty and then to the Senate Appeals Committee, both of which dismissed her appeals.
She sought judicial review, arguing procedural unfairness and unreasonableness.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding no manifest unfairness in the university's robust evaluation process and holding that the Senate Appeals Committee decision was reasonable and sufficiently grappled with the central issues.
