3 total
Interim sole custody granted to mother; father ordered to pay ongoing child and spousal support.
The applicant father brought a motion for interim joint custody of the parties' three-year-old child, as well as determinations on child and spousal support.
The respondent mother brought a cross-motion for interim sole custody, retroactive and ongoing child support for both the parties' child and her older child from a previous relationship, and retroactive and ongoing spousal support.
The court granted interim sole custody to the mother, finding that the parties' inability to communicate and the child's lack of overnight visits with the father militated against joint custody.
The court ordered the father to pay ongoing child support for the parties' child and spousal support, but dismissed the claims for retroactive support and child support for the older child, finding the father did not stand in loco parentis.
Reduced lump‑sum costs awarded after divided success in family law trial.
Following a ten‑day family law trial concerning custody and access of two children and an unsuccessful contempt motion, the court addressed costs.
The applicant sought full indemnity costs exceeding $69,000, while the respondent argued success was divided and requested no costs or set‑offs for prior awards and assessment expenses.
Applying the presumption under Rule 24(1) of the Family Law Rules but recognizing the court’s discretion, the court found partial success for both parties but greater success for the applicant.
The court rejected certain claimed costs, required the parties to share the expense of an expert assessment, and considered the potential financial impact of a costs award on the children.
A reduced lump‑sum costs award of $20,000 was ordered payable by the respondent.
Sole custody granted to mother; contempt motion dismissed.
A mother brought an application to vary a prior custody order and sought sole custody of two adolescent children amid a high-conflict parenting dispute marked by allegations of parental alienation.
The father sought a finding of contempt alleging the mother failed to ensure the children attended access visits.
The court found elements of both alienation and justified estrangement, concluding the children’s reluctance to see the father was influenced by both parents’ conduct and the father’s rigid parenting style.
Given the parents’ inability to cooperate and the children’s expressed preferences, sole custody was granted to the mother with defined access to the father.
The contempt motion was dismissed because the father failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the mother intentionally breached prior access orders.
