The accused was charged with driving while suspended and displaying a suspended driver's licence.
He argued a due diligence defence of officially induced error, claiming he believed his licence was valid after registering for a remedial program.
The court found the Crown proved the offences beyond a reasonable doubt and that the accused failed to establish due diligence on a balance of probabilities, as a reasonable person would have made more fulsome inquiries.
Findings of guilt were entered on both charges.
