The moving defendants sought summary judgment dismissing liability claims arising from a chain-reaction rear-end motor vehicle accident.
They argued there was no genuine issue requiring a trial regarding their liability.
The court found conflicting evidence concerning how the collision occurred, including discrepancies relating to lane changes and cell phone usage prior to the accident.
Credibility issues affecting both drivers could not be resolved on the written record.
The court held that a full appreciation of the evidence required oral testimony at trial and dismissed the motion.
