The accused brought pre-trial applications alleging racial profiling by police, breach of his right to counsel, and seeking to quash a search warrant for his vehicle.
The accused also sought leave to cross-examine the affiant of the Information to Obtain (ITO) the search warrant.
The court dismissed the application to cross-examine the affiant, finding no reasonable likelihood it would assist in challenging the warrant.
The court rejected the accused's evidence entirely, finding the police officer recognized the accused from a recent shooting investigation and did not engage in racial profiling when running his license plate.
The court found the accused was properly provided his right to counsel and that the search warrant was validly issued based on reasonable and probable grounds.