The moving party (father) brought a motion for an order requiring the responding party (mother) to file necessary forms to commence immediate reconciliation counselling between the children and the father at Pathstone.
The Children's Lawyer supported immediate counselling.
The mother objected to paying her share and to the agency's process of communicating with lawyers.
The court granted the motion, finding the children needed immediate counselling and concluding the mother's objections were not serious and demonstrated she was deliberately stalling reconciliation for her own purposes.
