The appellant brought a motion under s. 21(5) of the Courts of Justice Act to set aside or vary an order of a single judge of the Divisional Court requiring him to pay outstanding costs and post security for costs for his family law appeals.
The appellant sought to introduce his 2022 income tax return as fresh evidence to show a dramatically reduced income.
The Divisional Court dismissed the motion to introduce fresh evidence, applying the Palmer test.
The court also dismissed the motion to set aside the security for costs order, finding no error of law or palpable and overriding error in the motion judge's exercise of discretion.