William Hunter

The applicants applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever their rural property into three separate parcels to create two new lots for future residential development.

The applications were unopposed.

The Committee found that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, had adequate regard for matters of provincial interest, and satisfied the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The Committee granted the provisional consent subject to several conditions, including cash-in-lieu of parkland, road widening conveyance, and a report demonstrating the adequacy of the aquifer to support the development.

The applicants sought to subdivide their property to create two new lots for future residential development.

They applied for a minor variance to permit a reduced separation distance of 151 metres from an existing livestock facility to a proposed building envelope, whereas the Zoning By-law required 182 metres.

The Committee of Adjustment applied the four-part test under subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act.

Finding that the variance was minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintained the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, the Committee granted the application.

The applicants sought consent to sever their rural property into three separate parcels to create two new lots for future residential development.

The Committee of Adjustment considered the revised proposal, which increased the frontage and area of the proposed lots to address the City's concerns.

Finding that the application was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and met the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act, the Committee granted the provisional consent subject to several conditions, including the conveyance of a road widening and the provision of a well water adequacy report.

The applicants sought consent to sever their rural property to create a new lot for residential development, retaining a vacant parcel.

The South Nation Conservation Authority and the City of Ottawa requested conditions of approval, including a plan confirming the location of the septic system.

The Committee of Adjustment found the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application was granted subject to conditions regarding parkland dedication, groundwater and soil notices, road widening, and septic system compliance.

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever their property into three separate parcels to create two new lots for future residential development.

The Committee considered the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act and the Provincial Policy Statement.

Finding that a plan of subdivision was not necessary and that the proposal was consistent with provincial and municipal planning policies, the Committee granted the provisional consent subject to several conditions, including a noise attenuation study and groundwater adequacy reports.

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever a rural property into two separate parcels to create a new lot for residential development.

The retained lot would be vacant, while the severed lot would contain an existing detached dwelling.

The Committee found that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, had regard for matters of provincial interest, and satisfied the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application was granted subject to several conditions, including the provision of cash-in-lieu of parkland, road widening, and reports demonstrating the adequacy of the aquifer and private sewage systems.

The applicant sought consent to sever a property into three separate parcels to create two new lots for residential development.

The Committee of Adjustment considered the application under the Planning Act and found it consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement.

The application was granted subject to several conditions, including requirements for a geotechnical report addressing karst topography and agreements regarding soil and groundwater quality.

The applicant, Triform Construction Inc., applied for consent under section 53 of the Planning Act to create drainage easements across four previously subdivided parcels of land.

Residents raised concerns regarding the impact on mature trees and the adequacy of the proposed drainage solutions.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, had adequate regard for matters of provincial interest, and met the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The applications for consent were granted subject to conditions regarding the registration of a Reference Plan and the electronic registration of the easements.

The applicants sought consent to sever their rural property into three separate parcels to create two new lots for future residential development, retaining the existing dwelling on the third parcel.

The City requested adjournments to review various environmental, geotechnical, and mineral resource impact studies.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and met the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act.

Provisional consent was granted subject to several conditions, including the completion of a Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment, a Mineral Resource Impact Assessment, and a Geotechnical Report to the City's satisfaction.

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever its property into two separate parcels to create one new lot for residential development.

The Committee considered the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act and found the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement.

The application was granted subject to conditions, including a requirement to register a noise warning on title.

The applicant sought a minor variance under section 45 of the Planning Act to permit an increased footprint area of 116.22 square metres for a coach house, whereas the Zoning By-law permits a maximum of 95 square metres.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the requested variance met the four-part statutory test, as it was minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintained the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

The Committee declined to impose the City's requested condition for a notice on title concerning groundwater, finding it unreasonable given the minor increase in building footprint.

The application was granted.

The applicants sought consent under Section 53 of the Planning Act for a lot line adjustment and a grant of easement/right of way.

The severed land, containing two existing accessory buildings, would merge with the abutting property to the west, while an easement would be established over the severed land in favour of the retained land for access.

The Committee of Adjustment found the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and satisfied the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application was granted subject to conditions, including the consolidation of the severed land with the abutting property.

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever a property to create one new residential lot.

The Committee considered the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act and found the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement.

The application was granted subject to conditions, including the provision of an Environmental Impact Statement and a report demonstrating the adequacy of the aquifer.

The applicants sought consent under section 53 of the Planning Act to sever their property into two separate parcels to create one new lot for residential development.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, had adequate regard for matters of provincial interest, and met the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application was granted subject to conditions, including the provision of independent private sewage systems and a report demonstrating the adequacy of the aquifer.

The applicant sought consent under section 53 of the Planning Act to subdivide a property into three separate parcels to create two new lots for future residential development.

City Planning staff requested an adjournment to allow for a mineral resource impact assessment.

The Committee of Adjustment proceeded with the hearing and granted provisional consent, finding the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and section 51(24) of the Planning Act, subject to conditions including the provision of a mineral resource impact assessment and a groundwater adequacy report.

The applicants sought permission under section 45(2) of the Planning Act to reconstruct a garage that is a legal non-conforming use in the RU zone.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the proposal met the two-fold test relating to desirability and impact, noting no concerns from the City Planning Report and no evidence of unacceptable adverse impacts on abutting properties.

The application was granted.

The applicant sought a minor variance under section 45 of the Planning Act to permit an increased building height of 12.95 metres for a proposed three-storey detached dwelling with a secondary dwelling unit, whereas the Zoning By-law permits a maximum of 12 metres.

The Committee of Adjustment applied the four-part statutory test and found that the variance was minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintained the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

The application was granted, subject to the construction being in accordance with the filed plans.

The applicants sought consent to sever their rural property to create one new lot for future residential development.

The City requested an adjournment due to errors in Official Plan policies, but the Committee proceeded with the hearing.

The Committee found the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act.

Provisional consent was granted subject to several conditions, including a development agreement, road widening, and proof of adequate groundwater.

The applicant sought consent to sever their property into three separate parcels to create two new lots for future residential development, retaining the existing dwelling.

City Planning staff requested an adjournment due to errors in Official Plan Policies, but the Committee proceeded with the hearing.

The Committee granted the applications, finding the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and in compliance with the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act, subject to several conditions including cash-in-lieu of parkland and geotechnical/groundwater agreements.

The applicants sought consent to sever their rural property into three separate parcels to create two new residential lots.

City Planning staff requested an adjournment due to pending Official Plan policies, which the Committee denied.

The Committee granted provisional consent, modifying the City's requested conditions by removing the noise attenuation study requirement for the railway corridor and the road widening requirement for Crawford Side Road, but retaining the requirement for a notice on title regarding groundwater.

The Committee found the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the Planning Act.