Terence Otto

The applicants sought consent for a lot line adjustment to convey a 4.04-hectare portion of their property to an abutting lot.

The City requested a condition requiring a road widening dedication.

The applicants' agent requested that an existing log fence be permitted to remain within the expanded right of way.

The Committee of Adjustment granted the consent, finding it consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The Committee modified the road widening condition to allow the existing fence to remain.

The applicant sought consent to sever a property into three separate parcels for residential development, with the existing dwelling to be demolished.

The Committee of Adjustment considered the application under section 53 of the Planning Act.

Finding that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, had regard for matters of provincial interest, and met the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act, the Committee granted the provisional consent subject to several conditions, including cash-in-lieu of parkland, noise attenuation measures, and tree protection.

The applicant sought consent under section 53 of the Planning Act to sever a property to create a new lot for a surplus farm dwelling.

The retained parcel would continue to be used for agricultural purposes.

The City's Planning Services had no concerns, provided that two accessory buildings on the retained parcel were used in conformity with the Zoning By-law.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the application was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and met the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application for consent was granted subject to conditions, including a zoning by-law amendment to prohibit residential development on the retained lands.

The applicants sought to subdivide their property to create two new lots for future residential development.

They applied for a minor variance to permit a reduced separation distance of 151 metres from an existing livestock facility to a proposed building envelope, whereas the Zoning By-law required 182 metres.

The Committee of Adjustment applied the four-part test under subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act.

Finding that the variance was minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintained the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, the Committee granted the application.

The applicants sought minor variances to permit an addition to their dwelling located within the floodplain of the Rideau River.

The variances requested relief from the 30-metre watercourse setback and the 20-square-metre limit for additions in a floodplain overlay.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the variances met the four-part test under subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act, noting that the proposal improved upon the existing setback and fit well within the neighbourhood.

The application was granted subject to site plan conditions.

The applicants sought consent to sever their rural property into three separate parcels to create two new lots for future residential development.

The Committee of Adjustment considered the revised proposal, which increased the frontage and area of the proposed lots to address the City's concerns.

Finding that the application was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and met the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act, the Committee granted the provisional consent subject to several conditions, including the conveyance of a road widening and the provision of a well water adequacy report.

The applicants applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever their rural property into three separate parcels to create two new lots for future residential development.

The applications were unopposed.

The Committee found that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, had adequate regard for matters of provincial interest, and satisfied the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The Committee granted the provisional consent subject to several conditions, including cash-in-lieu of parkland, road widening conveyance, and a report demonstrating the adequacy of the aquifer to support the development.

The applicant sought consent under section 53 of the Planning Act to subdivide a property into three separate parcels to create two new lots for future residential development.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, had regard for matters of provincial interest, and satisfied the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The applications were granted subject to conditions, including the provision of a groundwater adequacy report and the conveyance of a road widening.

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever a rural property into two separate parcels to create a new lot for residential development.

The retained lot would be vacant, while the severed lot would contain an existing detached dwelling.

The Committee found that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, had regard for matters of provincial interest, and satisfied the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application was granted subject to several conditions, including the provision of cash-in-lieu of parkland, road widening, and reports demonstrating the adequacy of the aquifer and private sewage systems.

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever their property into three separate parcels to create two new lots for future residential development.

The Committee considered the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act and the Provincial Policy Statement.

Finding that a plan of subdivision was not necessary and that the proposal was consistent with provincial and municipal planning policies, the Committee granted the provisional consent subject to several conditions, including a noise attenuation study and groundwater adequacy reports.

The applicants sought consent to sever their rural property to create a new lot for residential development, retaining a vacant parcel.

The South Nation Conservation Authority and the City of Ottawa requested conditions of approval, including a plan confirming the location of the septic system.

The Committee of Adjustment found the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application was granted subject to conditions regarding parkland dedication, groundwater and soil notices, road widening, and septic system compliance.

The applicant sought consent to sever a property into three separate parcels to create two new lots for residential development.

The Committee of Adjustment considered the application under the Planning Act and found it consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement.

The application was granted subject to several conditions, including requirements for a geotechnical report addressing karst topography and agreements regarding soil and groundwater quality.

The applicants sought consent to sever their property to create one new lot for residential development.

The Committee of Adjustment considered the application under the Planning Act, noting no concerns from the City Planner or other agencies.

The Committee found the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and satisfied the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application was granted subject to several conditions, including cash-in-lieu of parkland, environmental mitigation measures, and groundwater/sewage system requirements.

The applicants sought consent to sever their rural property into three separate parcels to create two new lots for future residential development, retaining the existing dwelling on the third parcel.

The City requested adjournments to review various environmental, geotechnical, and mineral resource impact studies.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and met the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act.

Provisional consent was granted subject to several conditions, including the completion of a Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment, a Mineral Resource Impact Assessment, and a Geotechnical Report to the City's satisfaction.

The applicant, Triform Construction Inc., applied for consent under section 53 of the Planning Act to create drainage easements across four previously subdivided parcels of land.

Residents raised concerns regarding the impact on mature trees and the adequacy of the proposed drainage solutions.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, had adequate regard for matters of provincial interest, and met the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The applications for consent were granted subject to conditions regarding the registration of a Reference Plan and the electronic registration of the easements.

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever its property into two separate parcels to create one new lot for residential development.

The Committee considered the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act and found the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement.

The application was granted subject to conditions, including a requirement to register a noise warning on title.

The applicant sought a minor variance under section 45 of the Planning Act to permit an increased footprint area of 116.22 square metres for a coach house, whereas the Zoning By-law permits a maximum of 95 square metres.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the requested variance met the four-part statutory test, as it was minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintained the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

The Committee declined to impose the City's requested condition for a notice on title concerning groundwater, finding it unreasonable given the minor increase in building footprint.

The application was granted.

The applicants sought consent under Section 53 of the Planning Act for a lot line adjustment and a grant of easement/right of way.

The severed land, containing two existing accessory buildings, would merge with the abutting property to the west, while an easement would be established over the severed land in favour of the retained land for access.

The Committee of Adjustment found the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and satisfied the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application was granted subject to conditions, including the consolidation of the severed land with the abutting property.

The applicants sought consent under section 53 of the Planning Act to sever their property into two separate parcels to create one new lot for residential development.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, had adequate regard for matters of provincial interest, and met the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application was granted subject to conditions, including the provision of independent private sewage systems and a report demonstrating the adequacy of the aquifer.

The applicant sought consent to sever a rural property to create one new residential lot, retaining the existing dwelling on the retained parcel.

The City had no concerns but requested conditions, including a potential road widening.

The Committee of Adjustment found the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application was granted subject to standard conditions, including provisions for road widening and groundwater adequacy.