Motion for stay pending judicial review denied, but adjournment granted based on balance of convenience.
The respondent CMHC brought a motion for a stay or, in the alternative, an adjournment of the human rights complaint proceedings pending its application for judicial review of an interim decision adding it as a party.
The Board of Inquiry denied the stay, finding that CMHC would not suffer irreparable harm if the proceedings continued.
However, the Board granted an adjournment, concluding that the jurisdictional issue raised by CMHC was substantial and the balance of convenience favoured adjourning the matter to avoid potentially unnecessary expenditures of time and public funds.
Iness v. Caroline Co-operative Homes Inc. (No. 3), 2001 CanLII 61051