Statutory freeze preserves employer's right to discharge for business reasons; work refusal complaint dismissed.
The union filed a complaint alleging that the employer violated the statutory freeze under section 70(1) of the Labour Relations Act by discharging an employee without just cause, and violated the Occupational Health and Safety Act by discharging another employee for refusing unsafe work.
The Board dismissed the section 70 complaint, holding that the statutory freeze preserves the employer's right to conduct business as before, which includes the right to discharge employees for normal business reasons not motivated by anti-union sentiment.
The Board also dismissed the health and safety complaint, finding that the employee did not have reasonable grounds to believe the work was unsafe and did not actually refuse the work for safety reasons.
Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 183 v. Burlington Carpet Mills Canada Ltd., 1980 CanLII 771