Employer's payment for a three-day lay-off constituted compliance with Board order for paid holidays.
The union complained that the employer failed to comply with a previous Board order directing it to provide employees with three additional paid holidays.
The employer had placed employees on a three-day temporary lay-off and subsequently paid them for those days, characterizing it as compliance with the order.
The Board found that the employer's actions reasonably met the minimum requirements of the order.
The Board also granted the employer time to respond to the union's request to reconsider the order to include two employees who had left the company prior to the original decision.
The International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) and its Local 27 v. Sparton of Canada Limited, 1986 CanLII 1547
