Marilyn A. Nairn

The complainant, employed in correctional services, filed a complaint alleging a violation of the Human Rights Code.

Following a prior decision determining the Board's jurisdiction, the Board directed the employer to advise whether it objects to providing certain production to the complainant, which had been provided in a related, now-closed complaint.

The complainant, employed in correctional services, filed a complaint alleging a violation of the Human Rights Code.

Following a prior decision determining the Board's jurisdiction, the Board directed the employer to advise whether it objects to providing certain production to the complainant, which had been previously provided in a related, now-closed complaint.

The Complainant, employed in correctional services, filed a complaint alleging a violation of the Human Rights Code.

The Board previously determined the complaint could proceed on this basis.

Noting that the Employer had provided certain production in a related, now-closed complaint, the Board issued an interim decision directing the Employer to advise whether it objects to providing the same production to the Complainant in this matter.

The Complainant, employed in correctional services, filed a complaint alleging a violation of the Human Rights Code.

Following the closure of a related lead case, the Public Service Grievance Board issued an interim decision directing the Employer to advise whether it objects to providing the same production to the Complainant as was provided in the lead case.

The complainant filed a grievance alleging the employer acted irresponsibly regarding her 2019 performance rating and sought a compensation increase.

The Public Service Grievance Board dismissed the complaint without a hearing under Rule 11, finding it lacked jurisdiction.

Under section 4(2) of O. Reg. 378/07, the Board is expressly precluded from entertaining complaints concerning the evaluation of a public servant's performance or the compensation provided or denied as a result.

The complainant alleged that the employer's actions in assigning performance ratings and resulting compensation were discriminatory based on age and gender, contrary to the Human Rights Code.

Following a case conference where the employer agreed to provide relevant data, the complainant failed to respond to the Board's subsequent inquiries regarding whether she intended to proceed.

The Board directed the complainant to provide particulars of her allegations or confirm her intent to address the employer's preliminary objection by a specified date, failing which the complaint would be dismissed as abandoned.

The Complainant, a Coordinator of Maintenance Services at a youth justice facility, filed a grievance alleging he was unfairly denied temporary COVID-19 pandemic pay that was provided to bargaining unit staff and certain other managers.

The Employer brought a preliminary objection that the complaint did not make out a prima facie case because the Complainant could not point to an existing term or condition of employment that was breached.

The Public Service Grievance Board agreed, finding that the pandemic pay explicitly excluded management and the Institutional COVID-19 Response Pay was limited to Youth Services Managers.

As the Board lacks jurisdiction to create new terms of employment, the complaint was dismissed.

The complainant failed to attend a scheduled mediation and hearing regarding the employer's preliminary objection to the Board's jurisdiction.

The Board issued a direction requiring the complainant to provide an explanation for her non-attendance by a specified deadline, warning that failure to respond would result in dismissal.

The complainant did not respond.

The Board deemed the complaint abandoned and dismissed it.

The grievor failed to attend the scheduled hearing for his termination grievance.

The Grievance Settlement Board issued an order requiring the union to provide an explanation for the grievor's non-attendance, warning that failure to respond would result in dismissal.

Despite an extension of time, no response was received.

The employer requested that the grievance be dismissed.

The Board dismissed the grievance due to the grievor's failure to comply with the order and apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter.

The complainant failed to attend a scheduled mediation/hearing by videoconference and provided no notice to the Board, though she had emailed employer counsel.

The Board adjourned the hearing and ordered the complainant to provide reasons for her non-attendance and lack of notice by a specified date.

The Board directed that if the complainant fails to respond within the time allowed, her complaint will be dismissed.

The complainant, a Health Care Manager in a correctional institution, filed a complaint seeking temporary pandemic pay.

The complaint was held in abeyance pending the outcome of a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed.

The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how they intended to proceed in light of the representative decision.

The complainant failed to respond to the direction, and the Board dismissed the complaint.

The complainant, a Health Care Manager, filed a complaint seeking temporary pandemic pay.

The complaint was held in abeyance pending the outcome of a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed.

The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how they intended to proceed in light of the representative decision.

The complainant failed to respond to the direction.

Consequently, the Board dismissed the complaint without a hearing.

The complainant, a Health Care Manager in a correctional institution, filed a complaint seeking temporary pandemic pay.

The complaint was held in abeyance pending a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed because the Board lacked authority to introduce a new term of employment.

The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how they intended to proceed in light of that decision.

The complainant failed to respond to the direction.

Consequently, the Board dismissed the complaint without a hearing.

The complainant, a Health Care Manager in a correctional institution, filed a complaint seeking temporary pandemic pay.

The complaint was held in abeyance pending the outcome of a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed because the Board lacked authority to introduce a term of employment not already existing in the contract.

The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how they intended to proceed in light of that decision.

The complainant failed to respond to the direction.

Consequently, the Board dismissed the complaint without a hearing.

The complainant, a Health Care Manager, filed a complaint seeking temporary pandemic pay.

The complaint was held in abeyance pending the outcome of a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed.

The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how she intended to proceed in light of the representative decision.

The complainant failed to respond to the direction.

Consequently, the Board dismissed the complaint without a hearing.

The complainant, a Health Care Manager in a correctional institution, filed a complaint claiming temporary pandemic pay.

The complaint was held in abeyance pending the outcome of a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed.

The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how she intended to proceed in light of the representative decision.

The complainant failed to respond to the Board's direction.

Consequently, the Board dismissed the complaint without a hearing.

The complainant, a Health Care Manager in a correctional institution, filed a complaint seeking temporary pandemic pay.

The complaint was held in abeyance pending the outcome of a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed.

The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how they intended to proceed in light of the representative decision.

The complainant failed to respond to the direction.

Consequently, the Board dismissed the complaint without a hearing.

The complainant, a Health Care Manager, filed a complaint seeking temporary pandemic pay.

The complaint was held in abeyance pending a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed.

The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how she intended to proceed in light of the representative decision.

The complainant failed to respond to the Board's direction.

Consequently, the Board dismissed the complaint without a hearing.

The complainant, a Health Care Manager in a correctional institution, filed a complaint seeking temporary pandemic pay.

The complaint was held in abeyance pending the outcome of a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed because the Board lacked authority to introduce a new term of employment.

The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how she intended to proceed in light of the representative decision.

The complainant failed to respond to the direction.

Consequently, the Board dismissed the complaint without a hearing.

The complainant, a Health Care Manager at a correctional institution, filed a complaint seeking temporary pandemic pay.

The complaint was held in abeyance pending the outcome of a representative complaint, which was ultimately dismissed.

The Board directed the complainant to provide submissions on how they intended to proceed in light of that decision.

The complainant failed to respond to the Board's direction.

Consequently, the complaint was dismissed without a hearing.