Who is Malcolm M. MacFarlane?

Malcolm M. MacFarlane is a adjudicator at the Child and Family Services Review Board with 22 decisions on record from 2022 to 2026. Key areas include other tribunals, family and matrimonial law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Malcolm M. MacFarlane sit on?

Malcolm M. MacFarlane has sat on Child and Family Services Review Board and Ontario Custody Review Board.

What areas of law does Malcolm M. MacFarlane decide?

Malcolm M. MacFarlane's most common areas include Other Tribunals (21 decisions), Family and Matrimonial Law (18 decisions), Administrative Law (3 decisions). Malcolm M. MacFarlane has handled 22 decisions across 4 areas.

How many decisions has Malcolm M. MacFarlane made?

Malcolm M. MacFarlane has 22 decisions on record from 2022 to 2026 across 2 tribunals.

Who frequently appears before Malcolm M. MacFarlane?

Representatives who frequently appear before Malcolm M. MacFarlane include Melanie Verdone, Tm, Ah.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Other Tribunals

Family and Matrimonial Law

Administrative Law

Criminal and Quasi-Criminal Law

Malcolm M. MacFarlane

Adjudicator·Child and Family Services Review Board·Since 2022

OCFSRB OCRB

cases · 5 yrs · OCFSRB, OCRB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Adjudicator· 10Member· 8Adjudicator· 1Adjudicator· 1Member· 1

Rachel Buhler

Practising Law - Employed25 cases2013–2025

Malcolm M. MacFarlane

OCFSRB22 cases2022–2026

OCFSRBChild and Family Services Review BoardMay 30, 2022

Application closed as settled after applicant withdrew non-compliance allegations during the compliance hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 120 of the Child, Youth and Family Services Act, 2017.

The parties reached a settlement agreement through mediation.

The applicant later alleged non-compliance with the settlement agreement and raised new concerns.

At the compliance hearing, the adjudicator advised that new concerns were beyond the scope of the hearing.

The applicant declined to proceed with reviewing the settlement terms and withdrew the application.

The file was closed as settled.

FD v. Catholic Children’s Aid Society of Toronto, 2022 CFSRB 26

Melanie Verdone

In Private Practice8 cases2013–2024

Malcolm M. MacFarlane

OCFSRB22 cases2022–2026

OCFSRBChild and Family Services Review BoardMar 29, 2022

Board orders children's aid society to provide corrected correspondence to fulfill settlement agreement terms.

The applicant filed an application with the Child and Family Services Review Board regarding a complaint against the respondent children's aid society.

The parties reached a settlement agreement requiring the respondent to provide specific written correspondence by certain dates.

The applicant alleged non-compliance when the respondent failed to meet the deadlines.

At a compliance hearing, the Board found that while the respondent missed the initial deadlines, it had subsequently provided the required correspondence, subject to minor corrections agreed upon during the hearing.

The Board ordered the respondent to provide the corrected correspondence and closed the file.

MR v Children’s Aid Society of the Counties of Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry, 2022 CFSRB 17

Appellant

TmSelf-represented
1 appearance

Applicant

AhSelf-represented
1 appearance
AsSelf-represented
1 appearance
BrSelf-represented
1 appearance
CawSelf-represented
1 appearance
DbSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edmond SaucierAgent
1 appearance
FbSelf-represented
1 appearance
JsSelf-represented
1 appearance
KacSelf-represented
1 appearance
LbSelf-represented
1 appearance
MmSelf-represented
1 appearance
RrSelf-represented
1 appearance

applicant_counsel

Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance

Child

Valeria RuosoCounsel
1 appearance

Children’s Aid Society of Algoma, Respondent

Dawn DuboisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Emma ByrnesCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Barbara TuerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Idris OrughuAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

FdSelf-represented
1 appearance
KacSelf-represented
1 appearance
MhSelf-represented
1 appearance
RwSelf-represented
1 appearance
Young PersonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nadya TymochenkoCounsel
1 appearance
Rachel BuhlerCounsel
1 appearance
Zoe AranhaCounsel
1 appearance
Alison Moonsie-MohanCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent

Melanie VerdoneCounsel
2 appearances
Jeffery HustinsCounsel
1 appearance
Joyce DittrichCounsel
1 appearance
Karen O'KeefeCounsel
1 appearance
Paul HeinenCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah SubhanCounsel
1 appearance
Wes MardenCounsel
1 appearance
Ben McIvorCounsel
1 appearance
Chris EtherdenCounsel
1 appearance
Christoper DiltsCounsel
1 appearance
Diane SkrowCounsel
1 appearance

respondent_counsel

Jeffery HustinsCounsel
1 appearance

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

0.5

cases/mo

OCFSRB21(95%)

OCRB1(5%)

Decision types

trial

motion

appeal

/Adjudicator

Malcolm M. MacFarlane — Adjudicator

Other Tribunals

Family and Matrimonial Law

Administrative Law

Criminal and Quasi-Criminal Law

Malcolm M. MacFarlane

Adjudicator·Child and Family Services Review Board·Since 2022

OCFSRB OCRB

cases · 5 yrs · OCFSRB, OCRB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Adjudicator· 10Member· 8Adjudicator· 1Adjudicator· 1Member· 1

Rachel Buhler

Practising Law - Employed25 cases2013–2025

Malcolm M. MacFarlane

OCFSRB22 cases2022–2026

OCFSRBChild and Family Services Review BoardMay 30, 2022

Application closed as settled after applicant withdrew non-compliance allegations during the compliance hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 120 of the Child, Youth and Family Services Act, 2017.

The parties reached a settlement agreement through mediation.

The applicant later alleged non-compliance with the settlement agreement and raised new concerns.

At the compliance hearing, the adjudicator advised that new concerns were beyond the scope of the hearing.

The applicant declined to proceed with reviewing the settlement terms and withdrew the application.

The file was closed as settled.

FD v. Catholic Children’s Aid Society of Toronto, 2022 CFSRB 26

Melanie Verdone

In Private Practice8 cases2013–2024

Malcolm M. MacFarlane

OCFSRB22 cases2022–2026

OCFSRBChild and Family Services Review BoardMar 29, 2022

Board orders children's aid society to provide corrected correspondence to fulfill settlement agreement terms.

The applicant filed an application with the Child and Family Services Review Board regarding a complaint against the respondent children's aid society.

The parties reached a settlement agreement requiring the respondent to provide specific written correspondence by certain dates.

The applicant alleged non-compliance when the respondent failed to meet the deadlines.

The Board ordered the respondent to provide the corrected correspondence and closed the file.

MR v Children’s Aid Society of the Counties of Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry, 2022 CFSRB 17

Page 2 of 2 (22 cases)

Appellant

TmSelf-represented
1 appearance

Applicant

AhSelf-represented
1 appearance
AsSelf-represented
1 appearance
BrSelf-represented
1 appearance
CawSelf-represented
1 appearance
DbSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edmond SaucierAgent
1 appearance
FbSelf-represented
1 appearance
JsSelf-represented
1 appearance
KacSelf-represented
1 appearance
LbSelf-represented
1 appearance
MmSelf-represented
1 appearance
RrSelf-represented
1 appearance

applicant_counsel

Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance

Child

Valeria RuosoCounsel
1 appearance

Children’s Aid Society of Algoma, Respondent

Dawn DuboisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Emma ByrnesCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Barbara TuerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Idris OrughuAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

FdSelf-represented
1 appearance
KacSelf-represented
1 appearance
MhSelf-represented
1 appearance
RwSelf-represented
1 appearance
Young PersonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nadya TymochenkoCounsel
1 appearance
Rachel BuhlerCounsel
1 appearance
Zoe AranhaCounsel
1 appearance
Alison Moonsie-MohanCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent

Melanie VerdoneCounsel
2 appearances
Jeffery HustinsCounsel
1 appearance
Joyce DittrichCounsel
1 appearance
Karen O'KeefeCounsel
1 appearance
Paul HeinenCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah SubhanCounsel
1 appearance
Wes MardenCounsel
1 appearance
Ben McIvorCounsel
1 appearance
Chris EtherdenCounsel
1 appearance
Christoper DiltsCounsel
1 appearance
Diane SkrowCounsel
1 appearance

respondent_counsel

Jeffery HustinsCounsel
1 appearance

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

0.5

cases/mo

OCFSRB21(95%)

OCRB1(5%)

Decision types

trial

motion

appeal

Page 2 of 2 (22 cases)