The applicant sought resolution of a dispute regarding the installation of three glazed openings on the west wall of a recreational accessory building.
The building department had refused to accept the as-installed windows because they exceeded the maximum allowable area of unprotected openings given the limiting distance to the property line.
The Building Code Commission found that the as-installed area of glazed openings substantially exceeded the allowable area under the Building Code and that no compensating measures were provided.
The Commission ruled that the construction did not achieve sufficiency of compliance.