Kevin Flynn

The Appellant appealed a 90-day administrative driver's licence suspension imposed after he refused to provide a breath sample.

The Appellant argued he was unable to comply with the breath demand due to his diabetes and requested a blood test instead.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the police had reasonable grounds to make the demand and that the Appellant failed to establish a valid medical reason for his refusal.

The medical documentation provided was incomplete and did not support his claim.

The Tribunal confirmed the suspension.

The appellant appealed a decision by the Minister of Transportation to downgrade his Class 'A' commercial driver's licence to a Class 'G' licence following a reported seizure.

The Ministry required the appellant to be seizure-free for five years before reinstating his commercial licence, treating the incident as evidence of epilepsy due to a prior seizure in 1995.

The Tribunal found that the 2012 seizure was provoked by a fall resulting in a skull fracture and brain contusion, and that a diagnosis of epilepsy was not appropriate.

The Tribunal concluded that the appellant did not suffer from a condition likely to significantly interfere with his ability to drive safely and set aside the Minister's decision.

The applicant appealed a decision of the Registrar of Motor Vehicles to suspend his driver's licence following a medical report of a seizure.

The seizure was reportedly triggered by alcohol and cocaine use.

The Registrar required a Substance Abuse Assessment and confirmation of abstinence, which the applicant failed to provide.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the Registrar was justified in suspending the licence and continuing the suspension until the required medical information was submitted.

The appeal was dismissed and the Registrar's decision confirmed.

The applicant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend her driver's licence based on a medical condition report indicating alcohol dependence.

The applicant failed to provide the required Substance Abuse Assessment form and medical evidence supporting reinstatement.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal confirmed the Registrar's decision, finding that the onus was on the applicant to provide the requested information and prove she did not suffer from a condition likely to significantly interfere with her ability to drive safely.

The Applicant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend his driver's licence under section 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act.

The suspension was based on a physician's report of depression and suicidal ideation following an acute episode.

The Tribunal found that the Applicant's depression was linked to untreated hypothyroidism, sudden job loss, and alcohol misuse, but that his condition had since stabilized under medical care.

Concluding that the Applicant no longer posed a risk to safe driving, the Tribunal set aside the Registrar's decision and reinstated the licence.

The applicant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend his driver's licence following a medical report of a hypoglycemic episode resulting in a seizure.

The applicant argued the episode was caused by overexertion and that his diabetes was now stable.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal confirmed the Registrar's decision, finding the suspension justified pending the applicant providing the required medical confirmations of stability for the requisite period.

The Applicant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend her driver's licence under section 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act following a medical report of a seizure.

The Applicant argued she had a panic attack, not a seizure, and her neurologist supported this, noting she had been seizure-free since 2011.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found the Applicant did not suffer from a condition likely to significantly interfere with her ability to drive safely and set aside the suspension.

The applicant appealed a decision by the Minister of Transportation to downgrade his Class 'A' commercial driver's licence to a Class 'G' licence following a seizure.

The Minister required a five-year seizure-free period before reinstating the commercial licence, in accordance with the Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators (CCMTA) medical standards.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the applicant suffered from a physical condition likely to significantly interfere with his ability to drive a commercial vehicle safely and confirmed the Minister's decision to maintain the downgrade until the five-year period was completed.

The applicant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend her driver's licence due to a medical report indicating alcohol dependence.

The Tribunal found that the reporting physician was in a conflict of interest, having participated in an intervention prior to notifying the Ministry.

Although earlier laboratory results indicated alcohol misuse, subsequent tests were normal.

The Tribunal concluded the applicant did not suffer from a condition likely to significantly interfere with her ability to drive safely and set aside the Registrar's decision.

The Applicant appealed a decision of the Registrar of Motor Vehicles to suspend his driver's licence under section 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act following a medical report of an alcohol-related seizure.

The Applicant had collapsed after consuming a significant amount of alcohol following exposure to hot gases at work.

The Tribunal found that while the collapse was due to alcohol excess, a diagnosis of alcohol dependence or addiction was not confirmed.

Relying on the Applicant's neurologist's opinion that the Applicant was safe to drive and did not require an alcohol treatment program, the Tribunal concluded the Applicant did not suffer from a condition likely to significantly interfere with his ability to drive safely.

The Registrar's decision was set aside.

The applicant appealed a decision of the Registrar of Motor Vehicles to suspend his driver's licence under section 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act.

The suspension was based on a medical condition report from the applicant's physician indicating alcohol dependence and a significant risk to safe driving.

The applicant failed to submit a required Substance Abuse Assessment.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found the Registrar was justified in suspending the licence and confirmed the decision.

The applicant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend her driver's licence under section 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act.

The suspension was based on a medical condition report indicating an unstable mental condition and bizarre behaviour.

The applicant failed to appear at the hearing.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal confirmed the Registrar's decision, finding the suspension justified in the absence of medical information supporting reinstatement.

The applicant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend his driver's licence due to cognitive impairment.

The suspension was based on a medical condition report from the applicant's family physician, which noted a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of 16/30 and moderate cognitive impairment of undetermined cause.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the applicant suffers from a mental condition likely to significantly interfere with his ability to drive safely.

The Registrar's decision to suspend the licence was confirmed.

The applicant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend his Class G and Class DF driver's licences due to a reported seizure.

Medical evidence initially suggested an unprovoked seizure, but subsequent neurological assessments confirmed the applicant's two lifetime seizures were provoked by binge drinking and sleep deprivation, not epilepsy.

The applicant's family physician confirmed he does not suffer from alcohol dependence.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found the applicant does not suffer from a medical condition likely to significantly interfere with his ability to drive safely and ordered the Registrar's decision set aside, reinstating the licences.

The applicant, a commercial truck driver, appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to downgrade his Class 'A' licence following a single seizure event.

The Registrar relied on the Medical Advisory Committee's recommendation that the applicant's venous angiomas posed an ongoing seizure risk, requiring a five-year seizure-free period.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the applicant had suffered a solitary, provoked seizure likely caused by environmental factors at work, and preferred the treating neurologist's opinion that the applicant was at low risk for recurrence.

The Tribunal concluded the applicant did not suffer from a condition likely to significantly interfere with safe driving and set aside the Registrar's decision.

The applicant appealed a decision of the Registrar of Motor Vehicles to suspend his driver's licence under section 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act following a medical report indicating he had suffered a stroke.

The applicant underwent three driver evaluations.

Despite some identified deficiencies in the first two tests, the Tribunal reviewed a DVD recording of the third road test and found significant improvement.

Considering mitigating factors such as unfamiliarity with the test vehicle, language barriers, and weather conditions, the Tribunal concluded the applicant's physical condition would not significantly interfere with his ability to drive safely.

The Registrar's decision to suspend the licence was set aside.

The applicant appealed a 90-day administrative driver's licence suspension imposed for failing to provide a breath sample.

She argued that a previous back injury and childhood tuberculosis prevented her from completing the breath test.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient medical evidence, such as pulmonary function tests or a specialist report, to prove she suffered from a medical condition that precluded her compliance with the breath demand.

The appeal was dismissed and the suspension was confirmed.

The applicant appealed a decision of the Registrar of Motor Vehicles to suspend his driver's licence under section 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act.

The suspension was based on a Medical Condition Report indicating the applicant had sustained a traumatic brain injury with significant deficits.

The applicant failed to provide medical evidence to support reinstatement.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal confirmed the Registrar's decision to suspend the licence.

The applicant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend his driver's licence under section 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act following medical reports of impaired motor function due to a spinal cord injury.

After a driving evaluation recommended cessation of driving, the applicant argued his physical condition had improved and his driving errors were due to unfamiliarity and lack of recent practice.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found the applicant's physical condition did not significantly interfere with his ability to drive safely and set aside the Registrar's decision to suspend the licence.

The applicant appealed a decision of the Registrar of Motor Vehicles to suspend her driver's licence under section 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act.

The suspension was based on two Medical Condition Reports indicating cognitive impairment.

The applicant argued she had a clean driving record and needed to drive, but provided no medical evidence to support reinstatement.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found the Registrar was justified in suspending the licence based on the medical evidence and confirmed the decision.