Jurisdictional dispute over off-site fabrication work resolved in favour of the responding union.
The applicant union filed a jurisdictional dispute complaint under section 99 of the Labour Relations Act, claiming that certain off-site fabrication work performed at the employer's shop should be assigned to its members rather than to members of the responding union.
The Board found that the work in dispute was not construction work and was not covered by the applicant's provincial agreement, but was covered by the responding union's shop fabricating agreement.
Applying the traditional six factors for jurisdictional disputes, the Board concluded that the work was properly assigned to members of the responding union and issued a declaration to that effect.
United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local Union 663 v. Kel-Gor Limited, 1998 CanLII 18422