Human rights complaint dismissed; termination for absenteeism following cancer recovery was not discriminatory.
The complainant, an employee with a long history of absenteeism, was diagnosed with cervical cancer and missed several months of work for surgery and recovery.
Upon her return, the employer issued a warning letter setting attendance conditions, noting her past absences including the cancer-related leave.
After a subsequent 40-day absence due to a car accident, her employment was terminated.
The Commission argued the termination was discriminatory because the cancer-related absence was a proximate cause.
The Board of Inquiry dismissed the complaint, finding that the employer had accommodated the cancer absence by allowing her to return to work and improve her attendance, and that the termination was justified by her subsequent failure to maintain reasonable attendance.
Ontario (Human Rights Comm.) v. Gaines Pet Foods Corp., 1992 CanLII 14230