Human rights application against family court judge dismissed due to adjudicative immunity.
The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of sex and family status by a family court judge during an ex parte motion.
The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss.
The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that the allegations against the judge were barred by the doctrine of adjudicative immunity and that no allegations were made against the Attorney General.
Mesly v. Attorney General of Ontario, 2013 HRTO 536