The worker, an auto mechanic, appealed the denial of entitlement for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
He argued the CTS was related either to a prior compensable neck injury or to his repetitive work duties involving vibratory equipment.
The Appeals Resolution Officer accepted the medical opinions that the worker's job duties were the primary cause of the CTS, with the neck injury potentially masking the delayed onset of symptoms.
The appeal was allowed, and initial entitlement for bilateral CTS was granted on a disablement basis.