Application adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter would be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.
Grievance applications withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its grievance applications against the responding party employer.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the applications.
Employment standards review resolved by minutes of settlement; trust funds disbursed accordingly.
The applicant employer applied for a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the funds held in trust by the Director to be disbursed in accordance with the settlement, with $2,478.85 returned to the employer, $1,540.91 paid to the employee, and the administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave for the application to be withdrawn.
Application adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter would be deemed terminated if neither party requested to proceed.
Employment standards review resolved by settlement; funds held in trust disbursed as agreed.
The applicant employer sought review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the funds held in trust by the Director to be disbursed in accordance with the settlement, with $2,964.83 returned to the employer, $2,500.00 paid to the employee, and $546.48 retained as an administration fee.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Application for review of refusal to issue order to pay terminated following parties' settlement.
The applicant sought a review of a refusal to issue an order to pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement resolving all issues in dispute, including an agreement for the employer to pay vacation pay, wages, and expenses.
Pursuant to section 69.1(5) of the Act, the Board terminated the application.
Union application withdrawn with leave of the Board and scheduled vote cancelled.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application with the agreement of the parties.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application and cancelled the scheduled representation vote.
Union's application withdrawn with leave of the Board and scheduled representation vote cancelled.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application and cancelled the representation vote scheduled for April 17, 2000.
The responding party was directed to post copies of the decision.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board and scheduled vote cancelled on consent.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application.
Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application and cancelled the scheduled vote.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board and scheduled representation vote cancelled.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application for certification.
With the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application and cancelled the representation vote scheduled for April 17, 2000.
Application for certification withdrawn with leave of the Board and scheduled representation vote cancelled.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application for certification with the agreement of the responding party and intervenor.
Default judgment granted against employer for unpaid union contributions and deductions.
The applicant referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding party failed to remit contributions and deductions.
The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.
Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.
The Board found the responding party violated the collective agreement and ordered it to pay $43,117.04 in damages plus interest and fees.
Grievance allowed in default; employer ordered to pay unpaid wages and benefits.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding employer failed to pay wages and benefits.
The Board found the employer violated the collective agreement, ordered payment of the unpaid amounts, and cancelled the scheduled hearing.
Employer ordered to pay damages for unremitted union dues after failing to respond to grievance referral.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging the responding employer failed to remit required amounts under the collective agreement.
The employer failed to file a response or notice of intent to defend.
Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the employer was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.
The Board declared the employer bound by the collective agreement, found it in violation, and ordered payment of damages, interest, and fees.
Board directs representation vote in construction industry union certification application.
The applicant union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members at the time of the application.
The Board defined the appropriate bargaining unit and directed that a representation vote be taken.
Request for reconsideration of duty of fair representation complaint dismissed due to delay and lack of merit.
The applicant filed a request for reconsideration of a Board decision dismissing her duty of fair representation complaint against the union.
The request was filed five months after the decision was released.
The Board dismissed the request, finding no reasonable explanation for the delay.
The Board also noted that the request would have failed on its merits, as the union's alleged failure to advise the applicant properly concerning mitigation did not amount to arbitrary, discriminatory, or bad faith conduct.
Board directs representation vote in construction industry certification application, declining to defer pending related proceedings.
The applicant trade union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The intervenor requested that the representation vote be deferred and the proceeding consolidated with a related termination application, arguing that the applicant already held bargaining rights.
The Board declined to defer the vote, finding it appropriate to proceed with the representation vote and determine any outstanding issues at a subsequent hearing if necessary.
Representation vote ordered in construction industry certification application; request to defer vote denied.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and an affiliated bargaining agent, and that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.
The intervenor requested that the proceeding be consolidated with a related termination application and that the representation vote be deferred.
The Board declined to defer the vote, directing that a representation vote be taken of the individuals in the voting constituency, with any outstanding issues to be determined at a hearing after the vote if necessary.