The mother appealed two arbitration awards that granted the father equal parenting time and ordered her to pay $25,000 in costs.
She argued the arbitrator erred in applying the best interests of the child test, changing the parenting schedule without expert evidence, and assuming equal time would reduce conflict.
The mother also sought to introduce fresh evidence, including an affidavit from a former therapist.
The Superior Court of Justice dismissed the appeal, finding no palpable and overriding errors in the arbitrator's decisions.
The court also rejected most of the fresh evidence, noting the therapist did not qualify as a participant expert and the evidence did not meet the Palmer test.