The applicants sought judicial review of a Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision finding they discriminated against the respondents on the basis of sex, gender identification, and sexual orientation.
The applicants argued the adjudicator breached procedural fairness by admitting a radio interview, awarded unreasonable damages, and erred in finding personal liability.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding no procedural unfairness as the applicants were aware of the evidence and did not object, and holding that the damages and personal liability findings were reasonable.
