The defendant sought leave to appeal a motion judge's decision dismissing its motion to compel the plaintiff to answer certain questions on examination for discovery.
The Divisional Court dismissed the motion, finding no good reason to doubt the correctness of the order, as the motion judge correctly applied principles of relevance and proportionality under Rule 1.04(1.1).
The court also held that the issue of answering discovery questions did not raise a matter of general importance.
