2 total
The court dismissed a motion to enforce a settlement agreement because the parties had not agreed on the essential monetary terms.
The plaintiff moved under Rule 49.09 of the Rules of Civil Procedure to enforce a settlement agreement.
The court determined that Rule 49.09 was inapplicable as the settlement was not a formal Rule 49 offer.
Furthermore, the court found that no enforceable common law settlement agreement existed because the parties had not reached a mutual agreement on all essential terms, specifically the precise monetary amounts, as evidenced by ongoing negotiations.
Consequently, the plaintiff's motion was dismissed.
Small Claims Rule 12.02 cannot be used as summary judgment.
On a Small Claims Court appeal, the appellant challenged the pre-trial dismissal of a $25,000 medical negligence claim arising from alleged negligent treatment causing loss of vision in one eye.
The appeal judge held that the deputy judge improperly treated a Rule 12.02 motion as a summary judgment motion and erred in dismissing the claim based on the appellant's failure to produce expert reports within timelines set at settlement conferences.
The court found the pleading itself was not inflammatory, a waste of time, a nuisance, or an abuse of process, and that dismissal on this basis denied natural justice.
The appeal was granted and the matter remitted to Small Claims Court for a hearing.
