This costs endorsement followed a motion for enforcement of an arbitration award.
The applicant was successful in enforcing the award but was denied a worldwide Mareva injunction.
The applicant sought substantial indemnity costs, arguing the respondents' conduct during arbitration was reprehensible.
The court, however, awarded partial indemnity costs, finding no reprehensible conduct by the respondents on the motion itself and affirming their right to require the applicant to prove their case.
The respondents were ordered to pay costs jointly and severally.
