The parties separated after a long marriage, but disputed the date of separation.
The court found the date of separation was August 15, 2009, when the respondent announced her intention to separate during marriage counselling, despite the parties remaining under the same roof for another year.
The court resolved various financial issues, denying the respondent's claim for occupation rent and the applicant's reciprocal claims for home maintenance and improvements.
The court also denied claims for retroactive child support and pre-judgment interest on the equalization payment, but ordered prospective child support and the immediate sale of the matrimonial home without a right of first refusal.
