The parties brought cross-motions in a family law proceeding following a 25-year marriage.
The respondent sought to sever the divorce claim from corollary issues, which was dismissed as he failed to prove the applicant would not be disadvantaged regarding health benefits.
Due to ongoing disclosure disputes, the court ordered a structured process for both parties to exchange missing financial information.
The applicant's claim for retroactive spousal support was dismissed due to an insufficient evidentiary record.
However, the court found a prima facie entitlement to interim spousal support based on compensatory and non-compensatory factors, ordering the respondent to pay $2,587.50 per month.
The respondent was also ordered on consent to designate the applicant as a life insurance beneficiary.