The applicant, charged with multiple firearms offences, sought standing to bring a s. 8 Charter application challenging the search of a motorcycle club clubhouse where items were seized during a warrant execution.
The Crown opposed, arguing the applicant had no reasonable expectation of privacy as he was not an owner, tenant, or resident.
The court found that the applicant's extensive use of the property -- including regular attendance, overnight stays, maintenance, renovations, financial contributions, storage of personal belongings, and ability to regulate access as one of ten members -- established a reasonable expectation of privacy sufficient for standing, even though the property was not his primary residence.