The appellant father appealed a trial decision regarding custody, child and spousal support, and equalization of net family property.
He argued the trial judge erred in designating the mother's home as the primary residence and ordering unequal access despite a joint custody order, and challenged the support and equalization orders.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the trial judge's decisions on primary residence, access, imputed income, and equalization were fully supported by the record and sensible in a high-conflict case.
