The appellant wife appealed the trial judge's equalization of net family property and costs award, arguing that post-separation losses in a limited partnership should be shared and that divergent notional tax rates should apply to taxable assets.
The respondent husband cross-appealed the imputation of income to him and the dismissal of his spousal support claim.
The Court of Appeal dismissed both the appeal and cross-appeal, finding no error in the trial judge's factual findings regarding the wife's exclusive control of the investment, the lack of evidence for divergent tax rates, the imputation of income based on the husband's credibility and lifestyle, and the discretionary denial of spousal support.
