The mother brought a motion for sole custody of the parties' three-year-old child, while the father sought joint custody.
The court found that both parties were good parents but were unable to communicate or make joint decisions.
To ensure both parents remained fully involved in the child's life, the court ordered joint custody with a parallel parenting arrangement, granting the father primary responsibility for educational decisions and the mother primary responsibility for all other decisions.
The child's primary residence was ordered to remain with the mother, and an access schedule was established for the father.