Appeal from a judgment requiring a homeowner to pay outstanding lumber invoices used in the construction of his residence after dismissal of a construction lien claim.
The appellant argued the evidence did not prove the lumber was ordered or delivered, and further argued he was merely an undisclosed principal not liable for unauthorized acts of his project manager and related entities.
The court deferred to the trial judge's factual findings on delivery and ordering, and held the appellant was liable for earlier invoices within the agents' actual authority and for later invoices through ratification once the agency relationship had become disclosed though the principal remained unnamed.
The appeal was dismissed.
