The applicants sought to discharge a collateral mortgage without paying a $4.25 million 'Participation Amount' owed to the respondents.
The applicants argued the Participation Amount was invalid on several grounds, including that it was a clog on the equity of redemption, offended section 8 of the Interest Act, constituted a criminal rate of interest under section 347 of the Criminal Code, violated the Unconscionable Transactions Relief Act, and was an unenforceable penalty.
The court rejected all these arguments, finding the Participation Amount was a valid collateral advantage agreed to by sophisticated commercial parties in exchange for forbearance.
The court ordered the funds held in court to be paid to the respondents.