The applicant father brought an urgent motion to enforce a prior order for in-person supervised contact with his two children.
The respondent mother opposed, citing extreme distress and self-harm attempts by the older child when faced with the prospect of seeing the father.
The court declined to order police enforcement, finding it unwise given the child's distress.
Instead, the court ordered a structured plan involving the Office of the Children's Lawyer or the court-approved supervisors to inform the children of the supervision terms and ascertain their willingness to attend, with virtual contact ordered if they remain adamant against in-person visits.
