The applicant, a self-represented accused in custody facing serious sexual assault charges, sought an order for broader internet and email access to prepare for his upcoming jury trial.
He argued that his current limited access to and disclosure review was insufficient for researching complex legal, technical, and scientific issues, and for contacting potential counsel or experts.
The court dismissed the application, affirming that while an accused has the right to self-representation, this right is not absolute and does not entitle them to the same resources as if they were not in custody.
The court considered the significant security risks and practical difficulties for correctional staff in monitoring broad internet access, and noted that Amicus counsel was available to assist with research.
