The applicant mother brought a motion seeking a Mareva injunction to restrain her daughter, a respondent, from depleting assets in two corporations controlled by the daughter.
The mother also sought an order for questioning of the daughter and corporate respondents.
The court dismissed the Mareva injunction, finding that the applicant failed to demonstrate a serious risk of asset dissipation or irreparable harm, noting that assets transferred between the daughter's wholly-owned corporations remained traceable.
The motion for questioning was adjourned pending a disclosure motion.
