The accused was charged with armed robbery, possession of a loaded firearm, and reckless discharge of a firearm following a bank robbery.
The Crown's case relied heavily on video surveillance and the testimony of a co-accused who had already pleaded guilty.
The court carefully assessed the co-accused's evidence as an unsavoury witness, finding it credible and corroborated by circumstantial evidence.
The court found the accused guilty on all counts, concluding he was the individual who brandished and fired a handgun during the robbery.
