The applicant mother brought a motion for temporary sole custody and week-about access of the parties' 11-year-old child, alleging the respondent father was alienating the child from her.
The respondent father brought a cross-motion to retain temporary custody and major decision-making authority.
The court declined to change the child's living arrangements pending a section 30 assessment, noting the child's established school routine and the potential disruption.
The court ordered that the child continue to reside with the respondent father, with specified parenting time for the applicant mother, joint major decision-making, and child support payable by the applicant mother.
