Rubin v. Canada (Clerk of the Privy Council), 1996 CanLII 247 (SCC), [1996] 1 SCR 6
Ken Rubin Appellant
v.
The Clerk of the Privy Council Respondent
Indexed as: Rubin v. Canada (Clerk of the Privy Council)
1996: January 24.
Present: La Forest, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ.
on appeal from the federal court of appeal
Administrative law ‑‑ Access to information ‑‑ Clerk of Privy Council justified in denying access to information requested.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, 1994 CanLII 3476 (FCA), [1994] 2 F.C. 707, 54 C.P.R. (3d) 511, 113 D.L.R. (4th) 275, 167 N.R. 43, 25 Admin. L.R. (2d) 241, reversing a decision of the Federal Court, Trial Division, 1993 CanLII 2944 (FC), [1993] 2 F.C. 391, 48 C.P.R. (3d) 348, 63 F.T.R. 1, 14 Admin. L.R. (2d) 246, granting an application for judicial review of a refusal to disclose information requested. Appeal dismissed.
Neil Wilson, for the appellant.
J. E. Thompson, Q.C., and Meg Kinnear, for the respondent.
The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
1La Forest J. ‑‑ The appeal is dismissed for the reasons given by Mr. Justice Stone of the Federal Court of Appeal, with the exception of costs. The appellant is entitled to his costs throughout.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitors for the appellant: Gowling, Strathy & Henderson, Ottawa.
Solicitor for the respondent: George Thomson, Ottawa.
