Martin v. Beaudry, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 898
Gérard Martin Appellant
v.
Paul‑André Beaudry Respondent
and
The Attorney General of Canada Mis en cause
and
The National Parole Board Mis en cause
and between
Gérard Martin Appellant
v.
Paul‑André Beaudry Respondent
and
The National Parole Board and the Deputy Commissioner
of the Correctional Service of Canada Mis en cause
and
The Attorney General of Canada Mis en cause
Indexed as: Martin v. Beaudry
1996: April 24.
Present: Lamer C.J. and L'Heureux‑Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier and Iacobucci JJ.
on appeal from the court of appeal for quebec
Prerogative writs ‑‑ Habeas corpus ‑‑ Parole revoked -- Detention ‑‑ Application for writ of habeas corpus dismissed.
APPEALS from judgments of the Quebec Court of Appeal, [1995] Q.J. No. 330 (Q.L.) and [1995] Q.J. No. 329 (Q.L.), affirming judgments of the Superior Court, which had dismissed the appellant's applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Appeals dismissed.
Renée Millette, Jean‑Sébastien Clément and Hélène Danais, for the appellant.
Jennifer E. Briscoe and Richard Stark, for the respondent and the mis en cause.
English version of the judgment of the Court delivered orally by
1Lamer C.J. ‑‑ For the reasons given by Madam Justice Barrette‑Joncas, as well as those of Mr. Justice Boilard, the two appeals are dismissed without costs.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitor for the appellant: Renée Millette, Montréal.
Solicitor for the respondent and the mis en cause: The Attorney General of Canada, Montréal.