R. v. McCarthy, 1996 CanLII 212 (SCC), [1996] 2 SCR 460
Michael McCarthy Appellant
v.
Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
Indexed as: R. v. McCarthy
1996: June 21.
Present: Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and Major JJ.
on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario
Constitutional law ‑‑ Charter of Rights ‑‑ Search or seizure ‑‑ Trial judge erring in finding that conduct of search not unreasonable ‑‑ New trial ordered.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (1995), 1995 CanLII 965 (ON CA), 31 C.R.R. (2d) 347, dismissing the accused’s appeal from his convictions on numerous weapons charges. Appeal allowed and new trial ordered.
Frank Addario, for the appellant.
Gary T. Trotter, for the respondent.
The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
1Sopinka J. ‑‑ We agree with the reasons of Carthy J.A. dissenting in the Court of Appeal. The appeal is allowed, the conviction is set aside and a new trial is ordered.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitor for the appellant: Ruby & Edwardh, Toronto.
Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General for Ontario, Toronto.
