R. v. I. (R.R.), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1124
R.R.I. Appellant
v.
Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
Indexed as: R. v. I. (R.R.)
1996: November 29.
Present: Lamer C.J. and Sopinka, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ.
on appeal from the court of appeal for british columbia
Criminal law ‑‑ Sexual offences ‑‑ Motion to adduce fresh evidence dismissed ‑‑ Court of Appeal’s judgment dismissing accused’s appeal upheld.
APPEAL from a judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal (1995), 1995 CanLII 18232 (BC CA), 67 B.C.A.C. 137, 111 W.A.C. 137, dismissing the accused’s appeal from his conviction of several sexual offences. Appeal dismissed.
Russell W. Cornett and Charles Lugosi, for the appellant.
Elizabeth A. Bennett, Q.C., for the respondent.
\The Chief Justice\
The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
1The Chief Justice ‑‑ The motion to adduce fresh evidence is dismissed. The appeal, which comes to us as of right, equally is dismissed.
2In dismissing the appeal, we should like to endorse the remarks below as regards the impropriety, be it in British Columbia or anywhere else in Canada, to proceed in the manner the Crown did.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitors for the appellant: Lugosi & Cornett, Prince George.
Solicitor for the respondent: Elizabeth A. Bennett, Vancouver.
